Time To Rethink Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals

In the February 2015 issue of the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, an article appears, “Increased Cervical Cancer Risk Associated with Screening at Longer Intervals.”

The editors of Women’s Health in their March 2015 issue pointed out that by report many patients were stunned upon learning after a negative co-test, they should not be rescreened for five years. Nevertheless, doctors were making decisions about patient concerns about rescreening and benefits involved without any input from the patients at all.

This is reminiscent of a time when a total laryngectomy was the surgery offered for invasive throat cancer invading the larynx. Doctors were aware of there being a less invasive procedure that would allow a patient to maintain the ability to speak and to eat. They simply never discussed the matter with patients. Then one day someone had a discussion, published a study and this study reflected the overwhelming majority of patients would rather suffer an increased risk of death than a certainty of being mute.

It just seems to go on and on. Why is it that physicians always view patients as outside of their circle of confidence?

All articles in this blog are the collaborative effort of attorneys Jerry Meyers, Brendan Lupetin, and Gregory Unatin.

One thought on “Time To Rethink Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals

  1. Thanks for the information. I had no idea that cancer screening could be so beneficial. Like you said, it really does save lives. That’s why I think I’ll follow your tip about rethinking how often I have a cervical cancer screening. I’ll make sure I change it to having it a lot more often. Do you have any other suggestions?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

What are you looking for?